Unconditional Love Doesn't Exist

In my early beta male days with girls, I sought idealistic love - unconditional love.

Even then, I learned that their love was conditional. Since taking the red pill, I've come to better understand the conditions of that love.

Up until now though, I thought the only people who could experience "love" unconditionally were parents with their children, and vice versa.

But then I thought outside of my experience. What if one or both of my parents had abandoned me at a young age? Would I still love them? I doubt it.

Similarly, if I maliciously and seriously harmed one or both of my parents, would they still love me? Nope again.

So poof. Unconditional love doesn't exist.

What does that mean? Get to work - because all love is conditional.

"Russia’s Gold Digger Academy"

Read it on The Daily Beast a few days ago (http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/11/11/russia-s-gold-digger-academy.html). As a Western man, my first thought was, "these girls are gross!"

But the more I thought about it, the more it made more sense to me - at least in comparison to the life of the average Western slut. Think about it:

Gold-digger girl: sex for money (obviously useful)
Western slut (in her prime): sex for ... gina tingles (useless, but as a feeling, is important to women, especially after the government and/or brainwashed betas provide for her)

In manosphere terms:

Gold-digger girl: hunting for the best betas (providers)
Western slut (in her prime): hunting for the best alphas (aloof assholes)

Of course, I'm not advocating that any man let himself be willingly taken by a gold-digger. I'm just saying that the Western perception that gold-diggers are somehow worse than sluts is wrong.

Heck, once most Western sluts pass their prime, they turn into gold-diggers anyway.

(It'd also be interesting to see a similar article for Western sluts - I'm thinking "America's Alpha Fuck and Beta Buck College").